Why a Kamala Harris Presidency Could Be a Game-Changer for Bitcoin

With the November 5, 2024, election just around the corner, the stakes have reached a high point as the race narrows to Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump. Since their debate, both candidates’ stances on key issues, including cryptocurrency, have been under scrutiny. 

Harris’s policy approach, in particular, could have substantial implications for the cryptocurrency landscape, especially Bitcoin. While Trump’s evolving stance on Bitcoin has attracted significant attention, some experts suggest that a Harris presidency may accelerate Bitcoin adoption.

VanEck, a leading investment management firm, recently released an article suggesting that "a Kamala Harris presidency might be even better for Bitcoin than a second term for Trump because it would, in our view, accelerate many of the structural issues that drive Bitcoin adoption in the first place." 

This assertion opens up a crucial dialogue about how specific economic policies under a Harris administration could lead to greater adoption of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. From initiatives like student debt forgiveness to a $25,000 subsidy for first-time home buyers, Harris' policies may exacerbate some of the very problems that drive people towards Bitcoin as a hedge against economic instability.

This article explores why a Kamala Harris presidency might be more favorable for Bitcoin, focusing on the key economic policies that could influence the cryptocurrency’s growth. In particular, we’ll look at how increased debt, inflationary pressures, and structural issues in the economy may set the stage for accelerated Bitcoin adoption.

‍

The Harris Economic Vision: A Glimpse

Kamala Harris has long been aligned with progressive economic policies, advocating for wealth redistribution, affordable housing, and student debt relief. Her agenda aims to ease the financial burden on lower- and middle-income Americans, but critics argue that these initiatives could also increase the national debt and fuel inflation. 

Two of her most talked-about proposals, student debt forgiveness and a $25,000 subsidy for first-time home buyers, illustrate the potential economic pitfalls that may indirectly benefit Bitcoin:

‍

1. Student Debt Forgiveness: A Double-Edged Sword

One of the cornerstones of the Harris platform is student debt forgiveness. As of 2024, the U.S. student debt crisis stands at over $1.7 trillion, with millions of Americans burdened by loan repayments. Harris has been a vocal advocate for broad-based student loan forgiveness, which could potentially erase a significant portion of this student debt.

While the intention behind this policy is to provide financial relief, there are broader economic consequences to consider. Forgiving student debt en masse would lead to increased government spending, which could further balloon the national debt. 

As government liabilities rise, there is an increased likelihood of inflationary pressures, as more money circulates in the economy without a corresponding increase in goods and services. Inflation erodes the purchasing power of fiat currencies, making Bitcoin—a deflationary asset with a fixed supply—more attractive to investors and individuals alike.

Historically, Bitcoin has been seen as a hedge against inflation, with many investors turning to the cryptocurrency during times of economic uncertainty. A Harris presidency could usher in a period of heightened inflation due to policies like student debt forgiveness, which could, in turn, accelerate Bitcoin adoption.

‍

2. The $25,000 Subsidy for First-Time Home Buyers: Increasing Home Prices and Debt

Another ambitious proposal from Harris is the $25,000 subsidy for first-time home buyers. The program aims to make homeownership more accessible, particularly for low- and middle-income families. However, critics argue that this policy could have unintended consequences that may worsen the housing crisis rather than solve it.

By providing financial assistance to prospective buyers, demand for homes is likely to increase. However, if supply fails to keep up with this surge in demand, home prices will inevitably rise, negating the benefit of the subsidy for many. Additionally, as more people take on mortgages to buy homes, household debt levels could rise further, exacerbating the already substantial debt burden faced by Americans.

This growing debt and potential inflation in the housing market can create an environment of financial instability, leading more people to seek alternative stores of value. Bitcoin, often referred to as "digital gold," could benefit from this instability. As home prices rise and fiat money loses value, individuals may turn to Bitcoin as a means of preserving wealth outside of the traditional financial system.

‍

The Rise of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) Under a Harris Presidency

A Kamala Harris presidency could potentially see the rise of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), digital versions of fiat money controlled by the government. While the U.S. has been exploring a digital dollar, a Harris administration might accelerate these efforts as part of a broader push toward “financial innovation”. CBDCs are seen as a tool for financial inclusion and streamlining government programs, but they raise concerns around financial surveillance and privacy.

Unlike Bitcoin, which operates on a decentralized network, CBDCs are entirely state-controlled, giving the government unprecedented oversight over financial transactions. This level of control could alienate individuals seeking financial autonomy and privacy, leading them toward Bitcoin, which offers pseudonymous transactions and freedom from centralized control.

As CBDCs gain traction, Bitcoin could become a refuge for those who value decentralized finance and see the risks of government overreach. Much like people have historically turned to gold in uncertain times, Bitcoin may serve as a hedge against a digital currency system that prioritizes control over privacy. In this way, the rise of CBDCs under Harris might inadvertently boost Bitcoin adoption.

‍

Structural Issues and Bitcoin Adoption: A Perfect Storm?

The VanEck article highlights a key point: a Harris presidency could accelerate the structural issues that drive Bitcoin adoption. But what are these issues, and why would they be more pronounced under a Harris administration?

‍

‍

1. Growing National Debt

Under a Harris presidency, it’s likely that the national debt would continue to grow, particularly if ambitious spending programs like student debt forgiveness and housing subsidies are implemented. The U.S. national debt is already over $35 trillion, and rising debt levels put downward pressure on the value of the U.S. dollar.

As government spending increases, the Federal Reserve may resort to printing more money to finance these programs, leading to inflation. This, in turn, diminishes the value of fiat currency, driving more people toward Bitcoin as a deflationary asset. Bitcoin’s fixed supply of 21 million coins makes it an appealing hedge against the erosion of purchasing power caused by inflation.

‍

2. Financial System Instability

The traditional financial system is often viewed as slow, bureaucratic, and prone to manipulation. Under Harris, who has expressed support for increased financial regulations and oversight, there could be greater intervention in markets, potentially causing further instability. 

In this environment, Bitcoin’s decentralized nature offers a compelling alternative. It operates independently of central banks and governments, making it a more secure and stable store of value during times of economic uncertainty.

‍

3. Increased Government Intervention

One potential hallmark of a Harris presidency is increased government intervention in both economic and social policies. From health care to housing, Harris is likely to push for more government involvement in everyday life. While this may appeal to certain voters, it could also lead to unintended economic consequences, such as increased taxes, higher national debt, and inflation.

For those who view government intervention as a destabilizing force, Bitcoin offers a way to opt out of the traditional financial system. Its decentralized nature makes it immune to government interference, making it a safer alternative for those looking to preserve their wealth in uncertain times.

‍

Comparing Harris and Trump on Bitcoin

While Harris’ policies could indirectly fuel Bitcoin adoption, it's important to compare her stance with that of Donald Trump, her primary competitor in the 2024 election.

Trump has had a complicated relationship with Bitcoin. During his first term, he was openly critical of cryptocurrencies, referring to them as a threat to the U.S. dollar. However, his stance has softened somewhat in recent years, with reports indicating that he may be open to more lenient regulation of digital assets.

Even so, VanEck’s argument suggests that a Trump presidency may not drive Bitcoin adoption as effectively as a Harris administration would. Trump’s policies are likely to focus on bolstering the traditional financial system, reducing regulation, and maintaining the strength of the U.S. dollar. While these policies may not be directly hostile to Bitcoin, they are unlikely to create the same economic conditions that lead to mass adoption of the cryptocurrency.

On the other hand, Harris’ progressive policies—though well-intentioned—could exacerbate many of the structural issues that drive people to seek out alternative assets like Bitcoin. Rising debt, inflation, and economic instability may all accelerate under a Harris presidency, creating a perfect storm for Bitcoin adoption.

‍

Conclusion: A Potential Catalyst for Bitcoin’s Growth?

A Kamala Harris presidency presents an interesting paradox for Bitcoin. While her policies aim to provide financial relief to millions of Americans, they could also worsen economic conditions that will eventually lead to greater adoption of decentralized cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. 

Initiatives like student debt forgiveness and the $25,000 subsidy for first-time home buyers would increase debt levels, push home prices higher, and exacerbate inflationary pressures—factors that traditionally drive people towards Bitcoin.

VanEck’s suggestion that a Harris presidency might be better for Bitcoin than a second term for Trump highlights the potential for Bitcoin to thrive in an environment of increasing government intervention, rising debt, and financial instability. As more people lose faith in traditional financial systems and the value of fiat currencies, Bitcoin stands to benefit as a decentralized, deflationary hard asset.

Regardless of the outcome of the 2024 presidential election, we face a stark reality: the United States will persist in its deficit spending, leading to an ever-increasing national debt. As interest payments climb, they will consume an ever-growing share of tax revenue, squeezing other critical areas of government spending. Inflation will continue to undermine the purchasing power of the dollar, further emphasizing the urgent need for a reliable alternative. 

In this context, Bitcoin emerges not just as a digital asset, but as a vital safeguard against the looming economic instability that stems from fiscal mismanagement.

‍